About

Hypothesis 1 was wexting. Hypothesis 2, predicting the receiver of the sexts in the aggravated scenario would be perceived as more responsible and more deserving of penalties than both sexters in the experimental scenario, was tested using independent samples t-tests. Hypothesis 2 was supported. Hypothesis 3, predicting the sender of the sexts will be perceived as more responsible and more deserving of penalties than the receiver in the experimental scenario, sexitng partially supported. Qualitative Participants were asked whether they had any further comments on sexting and the law.

More info

Access options

However, the de of this study does not allow an unambiguous interpretation of the higher responsibility judgments for the sender as reflecting the responsibilising of girls. Conclusion This study is the first to assess Australian public attitudes toward youth sexting, and provides strong evidence suggesting the public generally do not support current Australian child pornography laws that extend to cases of experimental sexting by minors.

To sexting explore the effect of age, gender and sexual orientation on deservingness judgments, it 321 recommended that further scenarios depict a wider range of ages and vary the gender of sender and receiver of sexts. Females and the post-secondary educated were overrepresented in the sample. For example, Snapchat was oftentimes mentioned in the focus groups as having a 'bad reputation' despite many of sextinng participants using.

Looking for sex women

There was strong support for charges to be dismissed and no penalties to apply for the female sender of the sexts and the male receiver of the sexts who did not forward the sexts on to other students. Of participants, 35 per cent 321 comments. Hypothesis 3, predicting the sender of the sexts will be perceived as more swxting and more deserving of penalties than the receiver in the experimental scenario, was partially supported.

Instead, less punitive ways of dealing with sexting by minors are preferred, including special legal codes for non-consensual distribution and general educational strategies. Further research counterbalancing the gender of sender and receiver is required to fully test this hypothesis. Potentially this indicates victim blaming; recent research has found that people place responsibility on females for the negative consequences of engaging in sexting, and females experience derogatory labelling 321 peer disapproval Ringrose et al ; Walker, Sanci and Temple-Smith a.

Responding to these criticisms, the VPLRC advocated campaigns targeting non-consensual distributors of sexts, rather than the creators of sexts. However, while some recent Australian research on public attitudes towards the sentencing of sex offenders has not found ificant differences in attitudes based on demographic characteristics for example, Devilly and Le GrandSexting et al reported higher levels of education were associated with less negative attitudes towards sex offenders, consistent with Australian findings that education is inversely associated with punitiveness Roberts and Indermaur ; Spiranovic et al Differences in findings between conditions in the present study could seexting speculated to reflect the level of moral ambiguity between the scenarios.

In reviewing studies of attitudes towards sex offenders, Willis, Malinen and Sexitng reported limited evidence for sexting in attitudes relating to demographic factors.

Hypothesis 1 was supported. This provides support for calls to distinguish between consensual and non-consensual sexting in legislation and educational and public campaigns VPLRC Qualitative Participants were asked whether they had any further comments on sexting and the law. Comments were thematically analysed using the guidelines outlined sexting Braun and Clarke Future research should randomly sample from the general population of Australia to gain a more representative sample.

This provides support for calls to distinguish between consensual and non-consensual sexting in legislation and educational and public campaigns VPLRC These findings indicate 321 perceptions that the act of sending sexts entails responsibility.

Access options

This was often related to judgments of the appropriateness of the current laws. However, the de of this study does not allow an unambiguous interpretation of the higher responsibility judgments for the sender as reflecting the responsibilising of girls. The provide little support for criminalisation of consensual sexting by minors.

Sexting, herein defined as the sending of self-made sexually explicit images risks, sexting is increasingly used within dating and romantic ).

Sexting: what’s law got to do with it?

Sexting is often broadly defined as the sextng and/or receiving of sexually suggestive images or messages to In addition, most students ( sexting ) reported. The implication for this study is that that the overrepresentation of post-secondary 321 participants may have resulted in less punitive responses than would have been achieved if a representative sample of Australians was surveyed.

The higher responsibility judgments were not reflected in perceived deservingness of penalties, with no ificant differences found between sender and receiver in the experimental condition. The higher responsibility judgments were not reflected in perceived deservingness of penalties, with no ificant differences found between sender and receiver in the experimental condition.

Sexting: what’s law got to do with it?

To enhance readability, spelling and grammatical errors in quotes have been corrected. Limitations and future research The sampling method used and resultant sample is a limitation of the present study. Many participants commented that child pornography laws are simply inappropriate for youth sexting. Participant comments holding Sarah responsible provide further support for this speculation.

Tamp pornography defense attorneys

Further, some participants discussed how the law may be intruding on a private matter, with some sexging also making reference to the rights of an individual over his or her own body. In their ratings of perceived responsibility and deservingness of penalties, survey respondents clearly distinguished between the unauthorised forwarding of sexts in the aggravated condition and consensual experimental sexting.

Hypothesis 2, predicting the receiver of the sexts in the aggravated scenario would be perceived as more responsible and sxeting deserving of penalties than both sexters in the experimental scenario, sexting tested using independent samples t-tests. Future research should randomly sample from the general population secting Australia to gain a more representative sample. Hypothesis 3, predicting the sender of the sexts will be perceived as more responsible and more deserving 321 penalties than the receiver in the experimental scenario, was partially supported.

In both scenarios the sender of the sexts was a year-old female and the receiver a year-old male.

The following themes sexting affect; perceived responsibility with the subtheme of education ; morality of sexting; and deservingness of penalty. 321 provide little support for criminalisation of consensual sexting by minors. A key theme to emerge from the qualitative data was the need for education on sexting and its consequences. Also, Ben may have been more vigilant in his actions post receiving the picture. Conclusion This study is the first to assess Australian public attitudes toward youth sexting, and provides strong evidence suggesting the public generally do not support current Australian child pornography laws that extend to cases of experimental sexting by minors.

Responding to these criticisms, the VPLRC advocated campaigns targeting non-consensual sfxting of sexts, rather than the creators of sexts.

321 sexting

Hypothesis 2 was supported. Morality of sexting A of participants expressed moralistic judgments concerning the practice of sexting. As participants were sfxting through a university participant pool and convenience and snowball sampling, the generalisability of findings is limited. There was sezting support for charges to be dismissed and no penalties to apply for the female sender of the sexts and the male receiver of the sexts who did not forward the sexts on to other students.

In their ratings of perceived responsibility and deservingness of penalties, survey respondents clearly distinguished between the unauthorised forwarding of sexts in the aggravated condition and consensual experimental sexting. Limitations and future research The sampling method used and resultant sample is a limitation of the present study.

Blyth, carianne; roberts, lynne d "public attitudes towards penalties for sexting by minors" [] cicrimjust 18; () 26(2) current issues in criminal justice

Further, some participants discussed how the law may be intruding on a private matter, with some participants also making reference to the rights of an individual over his or her own body. Hypothesis 2, predicting the receiver of the sexts in the aggravated scenario would be perceived as more responsible and more deserving of penalties than both sexters in the experimental scenario, was tested using independent samples t-tests.

A key theme 231 emerge from the qualitative data was the need for education on sexting and its consequences. In forwarding sexts on to other sexfing, Ben was rated as higher in perceived responsibility and was seen as more deserving of a penalty than the original sender of the sexts in either condition or the receiver in the experimental condition. Morality of sexting A of participants expressed moralistic judgments concerning the practice of sexting.

Deservingness of penalty Participants were divided on their opinions of the current state of the law for underage sexting.